An in vitro model to recapitulate the human osteoarthritic joint that will:
Provide a device based on a human tissue or multiple human cell type co-culture system for research and drug development in OA.
- Recapitulate the human disease being able to model early and late stage disease if possible.
- Be amenable to drug discovery and development studies and provide mechanistic insight into disease development (including pain development through biomarker detection). The device should be medium throughput and compatible with standard equipment and measurement platforms (e.g. microscopy, biochemical analysis, FACS, robotics).
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal disease affecting nine million individuals in the UK alone. A chronic disease, OA develops with a pathology characterised by cartilage loss, synovial inflammation, subchondral bone sclerosis and cyst formation, and osteophytosis. This pathology causes pain and a loss of a range of movements and ultimately results in joint failure (Dieppe et al., 2005).
Factors contributing to the development of OA include inflammation, trauma, ageing, obesity and genetic disposition (Heidari et al., 2011). Treatment for OA targets three main areas: pain relief, restoration of function and prevention of disease progression. The development of new therapies not only requires an understanding of the pathophysiology of OA, but also the associated biomechanical, inflammatory, genetic and environmental risk factors (Hunter, 2011).
In the investigation of treatments for OA, a range of humanised mouse, rat and guinea pig models have been developed to study different combinations of output measures such as pain, synovitis and cartilage degeneration, but these currently are not standardised making it difficult to compare results between studies. There is inter-laboratory variability even when the same models are used, making reproducibility of findings difficult (Vincent et al., 2012). Differences in animal and human physiology, particularly with regard to the immune system, can impact on the translation of preclinical findings to the clinic. In addition, the load bearing mechanics of joints in animal models which are quadrupeds presents further potential hurdles to translation.
Animal models of OA make it possible to study the whole joint structure with the majority of models focusing on the knee joint. These fall into two main categories: those that model painful behaviour (typically intra-articular monosodiumiodoacetate injection (MIA) and surgical models) and those that model disease progression through cartilage degradation (spontaneous and surgical models). Models recapitulating other aspects of the disease are less well developed – for example, there is a scarcity of papers published on bone changes in OA models and changes in other tissues including, the synovium, capsule, joint adipose tissue (infrapatellar fat pad), muscles, ligaments and tendons.
A typical surgical model of joint disruption is carried out for 12 weeks following surgery (with mice operated on at ten weeks of age) and thus a minimum of six months per experiment is required (Miller et al., 2012). Joint damage over the duration of the experiment can be extensive, leading to ambulatory deficiencies in the animals and in addition, the rodents experience high levels of chronic pain associated with the disease.
The welfare concerns, long duration and significant costs of running these whole animal models, along with their limited translation to the human disease, means that academic and industry researchers are seeking higher throughput in vitro models for both chemical and surgical induction (as assessed by histology or biomarkers).
This CRACK IT Challenge aims to develop an advanced in vitro model of the human osteoarthritic joint that will:
- Reduce the number of animals used in preclinical OA drug development and academic research by providing an alternative to the animal models.
- Improve the predictivity of preclinical modelling to humans through more extensive use of human tissues and/or cells.
- Provide a robust and reliable tool for development of potential disease modifying OA drugs.
Arthritis is an active area of preclinical study with a range of animal models used in academia and industry. No model replicates the human condition precisely, either in terms of pathogenic mechanism or response to treatment, and there is no consensus as to which model best recapitulates the human disease. Often researchers will run multiple models at the same time to assess reproducibility, therefore increasing the number of animals used (Ashraf et al., 2014). Moreover, if an OA model is being used to study pain or test analgesics, the experiment may require researchers to not administer post-operative analgesics, resulting in pain which may last for up to ten days (Kelly et al., 2013).
Chemical and surgical induction of OA in animals (MIA, meniscal transection (MNX), disruption of the medial meniscus (DMM) and anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT)) causes sustained and chronic pain, which progressively worsens with study length, typically 14-28 days for MIA injection in rats (Kelly et al., 2013), but up to 16 weeks for DMM surgery in mice (Miller et al., 2012). This ongoing pain and concomitant joint destruction significantly impairs animal movement and can have negative effects on other normal behaviours, such as feeding and nest building.
Although spontaneous models of OA do not involve any post-operative pain, there is significant variability in the development and severity of disease and models have to be used for significantly longer periods for example up to three years for Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs (McDougall et al., 2009) and 12 months for STR/ort mice (Kyostio-Moore et al., 2011).
Studies for preclinical arthritis models often require up to five groups per study with at least two treatment arms, using up to 40 animals per study. For a pharmaceutical company carrying out these types of studies, both in-house and outsourced, the total numbers of animals used per year can be in excess of 700 animals.
If solved, this Challenge will significantly reduce the number of animal models used in the study of OA and provide more human-relevant information such as novel biomarkers that may be used to refine any animal studies that are still needed through using earlier and more humane endpoints.
Phase 1 winners
- Dr Astrid Bakker, Stichting VU, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - ACTA, £99,973.
- Professor Kenneth Dalgarno, Newcastle University, £96,672.
- Dr Deborah Mason, Cardiff University, £99,820.
Phase 2 winner
Project team lead by:
- Professor Anne Dickinson, Alcyomics Ltd £999,996.
Full Challenge information
The following Challenge Panel considered applications submitted to this Challenge:
|Dr Ian Ragan (Chair)||Independent|
|Dr Jessica Neisen (Sponsor)||GlaxoSmithKline|
|Dr Thomas Lohr (Sponsor)||GlaxoSmithKline|
|Dr Jonathan Larkin (Sponsor)||GlaxoSmithKline|
|Ms Helen Hurman||Arthritis Research UK|
|Dr Martino Picardo||Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst|
|Professor Sarah Cartmell||University of Manchester|
|Professor Richie Gill||University of Bath|
|Professor David Lee||Queen Mary University of London|
Co-funded by Versus Arthritis and EPSRC