Challenge 25: Maximise

Objective

To develop reliable predictions which confidently classify mixtures of chemicals for acute oral toxicity, skin and eye irritation with a focus on relevance for human safety. These should fulfil acute GHS Classification and Labelling requirements for non-encapsulated agrochemical mixtures using existing information on components and formulations without the need for additional in vivo, and ideally in vitro, studies.


Background

Innovations in chemical products are characterised by novel formulations of existing and new ingredients. For agrochemicals, these are often mixtures of one or more active substances with any known toxicity concerns and co-formulants such as surfactants, buffers and solvents that may contribute to the overall toxicity. The toxicity profiles of these mixtures are complex and are often more than the simple sum of the ingredient endpoints with the potential for additive, synergistic and compensatory effects to be observed.

Even though a proportion of these ingredients may have already been tested for their hazard characterisation in previous uses, the novel formulation must be assessed for its classification and labelling according to international guidelines such as the UN Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) requirements. These guidelines require in vivo studies with toxicological endpoints addressing oral, dermal and inhalation lethality, skin and eye irritation, corrosivity and skin sensitisation. The studies can cause pain and discomfort to the animals and frequently use death (or signs of imminent death) as an endpoint.

There has been progress in the use of in silico and in vitro methods for specific acute endpoints on single chemicals and mixtures. For example, there are a number of in vitro methods which can be used to identify severe eye irritants and allow classification without the need for in vivo testing. However, these eye irritation tests do not incorporate the repair mechanisms seen in the in vivo model which is considered the ‘gold standard’. There are also a number of validated in vitro methods available to determine effects on the skin including the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in vitro skin irritation test guideline (TG) 439 (OECD, 2015b) and the in vitro/ex vivo skin corrosion tests, OECD TGs 430, 431 and 435 (OECD, 2014a; OECD, 2014b; OECD, 2015a) but their predictivity for agrochemical mixtures is not proven.

In silico methods such as acute toxicity estimation calculations (ATEs) can be conducted on agrochemical mixtures to predict acute systemic end points (acute oral, dermal and inhalation toxicity). Each ingredient and its proportion in the formulation is considered in the calculation. ATE calculations have good accuracy for the systemic endpoints but limited predictivity for skin/eye irritation and skin sensitisation and regulatory acceptability of such calculations is at an early stage.

Other in silico methods such as QSARs are routinely used for the prediction of single ingredients but none of these are individually developed enough to be considered sufficiently reliable to be used for mixtures.  A recent CRACK IT Challenge (QSARs Mix, 2014) was successful in the development of a more specific QSAR approach for assessing skin and eye irritation for petroleum chemical mixtures but an integrated solution that considers multiple chemical and toxicological data points that can be used to assess hazard characterisation for agrochemical mixtures is required.  

This Challenge aims to develop innovative, integrated in silico approaches to better predict the GHS classification category for acute oral, skin and eye irritation in the development of agrochemical formulations without using animals or generating new in vitro data. The Challenge also requires a disruptive business model whereby access and storage of industry data can be managed to provide predictive testing strategies for complex mixtures.

It is expected that this approach will have broader applicability to other industry sectors.    


3Rs benefits

Acute toxicity studies are used to assess the safety of the agrochemical products and to gather information for regulatory purposes. While industry continues to refine these studies, they can involve the use of high concentrations of test items which can lead to severe suffering, and sometimes death as an endpoint. 


Full Challenge information

          

 

Assesment information

The following Challenge Panel considered applications submitted to this Challenge:

Member Name Institution
Professor Ian Kimber OBE (Chair) University of Manchester
Dr Kim Travis (Sponsor) Syngenta
Dr Claire Elliott (Sponsor) Syngenta
Dr Laura Brierley (Sponsor) Syngenta
Dr Marco Corvaro (Sponsor) Dow AgroSciences
Dr Scott Boyer Karolinska Institute, Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Centre
Dr Uday Phadke Cartezia
Professor Richard Clayton University of Sheffield
Dr Steven Webb Liverpool John Moores University
Back to top
In progress

Budget information

Up to £100k

Sponsor(s)

Syngenta
Dow Agrosciences

Duration

Up to one year